« The first chain mail I have ever posted | Main | Detroit sticks its head in the sand and tries to pull all americians in there with them. »
May 30, 2007
Mark Jacobson's Ethanol study home page
One of the anti-ethanol studies came out of Stanford from this Mark Jacobson. Immediately the EThanol industry and Vinod bashed the guy as a sell-out to Exxon. On his home page: E85vWindSol you can read the report, the industry critique and his response. He claims no Exxon funding directly and that he used a NASA computer. But Exxon IS a big funder of Stanford overall. I e-mailed him and here is his response:
Martin,
Thanks for your email. That's a strange question to ask, but the answer is that the funding came from my Stanford University salary with computer support from NASA. I have no corporate sponsors nor have I ever performed research in my career at the request of any corporation. What makes you ask this question? The conclusions of the study imply that both gasoline and E85 will kill thousands of people each year as gasoline does today, and should be eliminated in favor of cleaner technologies. I think this is common sense and it doesn't require a corporate sponsor to draw such a conclusion.
The published paper and responses to industrial people and other advocates are located at
http://www.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/E85vWindSol
Sincerely,
Mark Jacobson
My summary: He is right that any internal combustion of anything is worse than electric or fuel cell. Unfortunately we are going to have internal combustion and diesel engines on the road for many many years, so we better get alternatives for them. We are not going to change the fleet in time.
Posted by Martin at May 30, 2007 12:22 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.nwventurevoice.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/2767
Comments
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)